Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Shahar Peer vs Tena Lukas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peer vs Lukas analysis and find out who is favored!
Shahar Peer vs Tena Lukas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Peer 1 - 0 Lukas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lukas has won 41.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lukas has won 59.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 44.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lukas has saved 50.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lukas winning 59.74% (W/L 46/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 247/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 18/ 23). Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 387/ 240), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peer winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Peer winning 2 and Lukas winning 1. The last match between Peer and Lukas was at the Fed Cup, Europe/Africa Zone Group I, 05-02-2016, Rubber 1, Hard with Shahar Peer getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peer and Lukas have played a deciding set 1 times, with Peer winning 1 times and Lukas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peer winning 0, and Lukas 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lukas has played against players with an average rank of 255.99.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lukas has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lukas has converted 54.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
11
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
231
Rank
200
High
29
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
58% (388-277)
Career Total W/L
58% (425-310)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
60% (18-12)
$2,894,734
Career Prize Money
$31,490
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Shahar Peer | Tena Lukas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:0 | 1:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (60/90) | 57% (52/91) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (39/60) | 56% (29/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (13/30) | 41% (16/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (46/91) | 42% (38/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Shahar Peer
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Shahar Peer | Tena Lukas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (18/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (43/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (343/317) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 62% (18/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 62 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.64 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 205 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:48:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 249.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (1313/2218) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (769/1313) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (370/905) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 54% (166/305) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1065/2140) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (18/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (18/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 78% (18/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (18/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (12/4) |
Shahar Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Cristina Goncalves
Player
Shahar Peer
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kateryna Volodko
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Valeria Gorlats
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
33%
(
19 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ipek Soylu
Player
Shahar Peer
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Cepelova
Player
Shahar Peer
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Glushko
Player
Shahar Peer
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Tena Lukas
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Alexandra Eala
58%
(
80 of
139)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
8
Aces
1
21
Double Faults
4
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
29%
(
17 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
69 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
53%
(
49 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Kaylah Mcphee
66%
(
82 of
125)
1st Serve %
80%
(
79 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Tena Lukas
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Conny Perrin
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
40%
(
31 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Anouk Koevermans
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
45%
(
14 of
31)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
26 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Peer Vs Lukas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
